About the Author

author photo

Preet Banerjee, B.Sc., FMA, DMS is a former stockbroker and financial advisor in Toronto. Information on this site is for entertainment purposes ONLY. Always seek individual professional advice before making any financial decisions.

See All Posts by This Author

The Counter-Intuitivity of Fixed Income Indices

January 18th, 2010 • Related • Filed Under
                                                         
feature photo

Mainstream fixed income indices suffer from the same quirk as most equity indices. Click here for more info, but in a nutshell a market capitalization weighted index assigns more weight of a stock in an index based on the relative market capitalization of the stock in question compared to the overall index. So if stock XYZ has a market cap of $5 billion and the index has  a total market cap of $100 billion, then stock XYZ has a weighting of 5% in that index. As the price goes up of the stock, so does the market capitalization and hence its weighting in that index. Theretofore price bubbles (irrationally high prices) leads to over exposure to overvalued stocks and underexposure to undervalued stocks (the exact opposite strategy that a rational investor would desire.

The same quirk holds true to fixed income indices which are also market capitalization weighted. For example, a fixed income index would assign the most weight to the largest fixed income issue. In other words your exposures are largest to the companies/entities that have the most debt.

Doesn’t that strike you as counter-intuitive?

Popularity: 1% [?]

Credit Repair - option trading

<--Please click on the green Retweet button if you like this article and want to share it on Twitter!


You might like these Related Articles:
Severing The Link Between Price and Weight Part I
How Much Of An RESP Should Be Invested In Fixed Income?
Mutual Fund Return Indices For 15 Years
Re-Thinking High Yield Fixed Income
Try to hold your fixed income positions inside your RRSP
Join over 1,500 readers who receive daily updates by supplying your e-mail address:
 

You may also subscribe to the WhereDoesAllMyMoneyGo.com RSS feed:

There Are 9 Responses So Far. »

  1. Comment by Four Pillars on 18 January 2010:

    Hmmm….that sounds logical to me in the sense that an index is a measure of the relative amounts of debt and interest rates of all debts within the index.

    I agree this might not be the best risk management strategy but that is not what indexes are for.

  2. Comment by Xenko on 19 January 2010:

    So would it make sense to have an inversely weighted index where you would buy less of the over-valued companies and more of the under-valued companies?

  3. Comment by Jordan on 19 January 2010:

    Is this the prequel to a Rafi Fundamental Fixed Income Index announcement?

  4. Comment by Patrick on 19 January 2010:

    @Xenko: the trick is determining which is which. I know Preet is into fundamentally-weighted indexing but I for one don’t buy it. With all due respect, it’s just another form of actively managed fund, and for those to work, they must exploit either persistent market inefficiencies or market fluctuations (ie. market timing). Given the weight of evidence behind the efficient-market hypothesis, I’m still waiting for evidence that either approach works.

  5. Comment by Xenko on 19 January 2010:

    @Patrick: There wouldn’t be any determining. Just take all the companies in a given index, and then weigh them inversely based on their market caps. Then you would have to test to see if it would give better or worse returns than the standard index. I don’t have access to the data to try and see if the theory would pan out at all, but it would be cool if someone could get all the data necessary to test this.

  6. Comment by Preet on 19 January 2010:

    @Four Pillars – true that was not the original intention of indices, but that is what they are used for NOW! :)

    @Xenko – it’s a bit more complicated than that. I’ll explain in the next post…

    @Jordan – lol – you’re a sharp cat, they did just launch such an index in the States a few months ago.

    @Patrick – there certainly are people who would suggest that it is actively managed, but there are also arguments that it is more transparent of an index than the major cap-weighted indices. Note that many major indices are formed by committee, whereas fundamental indices are screened from all publicly listed stocks measured by FTSE. You might be surprised to know that the formulator of EMH doesn’t believe in it whole-heartedly.

    @Xenko – actually, any weighting methodology which severs the link between portfolio weight and price will give the desired result (well, within reason I suppose). Over longer periods of time, it works. Perhaps I’ll start covering this in more detail over the next few weeks.

  7. Comment by Xenko on 19 January 2010:

    @Preet: I’d like to see it covered. Can’t wait for future posts. :D

  8. Pingback by Canadian Personal Finance Blog » Blog Archive » Random Thoughts: Without Inflating it on 22 January 2010:

    [...] does some number crunching of his own in The Counter-Intuitivity of Fixed Income Indices although I am curious about the word Counter-Intuitivity, can I use it in [...]

  9. Pingback by Severing The Link Between Price and Weight Part I : WhereDoesAllMyMoneyGo.com on 25 January 2010:

    [...] a recent post about market-cap weighted fixed income indices, it was noted by reader Xenko that one way to overcome overweighting overvalued companies and [...]

Post a Response